Thursday, May 31, 2018

Criminalizing Urban Youth


In the chapter titled: "Critical Social Theory and the Study of Urban School Discipline", Kathleen Nolan presents the results of her study examining how dominant social forces, those in positions of financial and political power, have created a system which intentionally suppresses any potential for success of Black and Latino urban youth.  She analyzes her findings with the support of two critical theoretical frameworks.  The first is known as the theory of punishment in society.  This theory suggests that punishment for certain actions and behaviors are warranted in order to maintain social control.  These practices, however, are unfairly enforced on urban Blacks and Latinos compared to their White or wealthier counterparts.  This clearly demonstrates that those belonging to lower social class communities are disproportionately targeted as engaging in criminal behavior and classified as delinquents.   Mainstream culture supports this practice because it has been normalized or viewed as common sense. One should face consequences as a result of his/her social infractions - if you commit a crime, or conduct yourself in a way that goes against the values established by mainstream culture, you should be punished for that behavior.   As these disenfranchised youth have vast cultural and demographic differences that set them apart from the dominant, mainstream culture, their insubordinate actions are criminalized.  The larger social context for such behavior is not taken into account.  These practices are meant to control lower-class, marginalized  communities by instilling fear.The second is the theory of social reproduction.  Schools in low socioeconomic communities are engaging in disciplinary practices that closely resemble those in prisons, thus reproducing a criminalized social class.  Students are not treated as learners but rather as criminals in schools, with armed security staff who are prepared to arrest and detain for any breach of school policy. This exacerbates their chances of ending up in prison at a young age.  The opportunity for academic success in this hyper punitive environment is so limited since learning has not been a priority made available to them.  Due to poor academic performance they will most likely drop out of school, never attend college and eventually engage in criminal activity that will lead to incarceration.

This is a well written chapter that counters mainstream ideology of how punishment is applied.  Here, the author clearly delineates the social context of marginalized urban youth and how they are unjustly targeted as criminals for behaviors that would most likely be disregarded if exhibited by a White student or by one belonging to a higher social class.  The results of this study has a great potential to elevate emancipatory practices in breaking the cycle of injustice experienced in the daily lives of urban youth.

6 comments:

  1. Rosa, you used the word "normalized" and I think that really captures some of the big issues with the ideology of punishment. The ways in which urban youth are depicted, normalizes their punishment. For example, this news came out that this young man will serve 5 years in jail for stealing a pair of sneakers (https://www.theroot.com/georgia-teen-with-no-prior-record-sentenced-to-5-years-1826480462). On the other hand, Trump has pardoned several convicted criminals including Joe Arpaio and Dinesh D'Souza (https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/31/politics/martha-stewart-rod-blagojevich-trump-pardons/index.html).
    For some reason, society finds it acceptable to dispense punishment not based on the crime, but the social class of the individual.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Totally! Which connects back nicely to Chiquita's comment about language on Rosa's previous post. And I'd add that their punishment further criminalizes them (so it's kind of cyclic) and that this criminalization 'normalizes' their precarious economic status (and that of entire communities) and/or someone's removal from their community altogether via incarceration.

      Delete
  2. David and Rosa you both bring up a very interesting point about normalizing behavior to justify the punishment. I think this is an important concept with the black lives matter movement. It has become normal to believe that all black men are criminals which is why people feel that it is okay to shoot innocent unarmed black men and the justice system has done nothing to prevent or punish those who have committed these crimes against these men. I think we see on a daily bases how social class plays out in the justice system. Let’s take the case of Brock Turner, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People_v._Turner, this young man’s social class and privilege got him off of rape charges. Many argue that is race played a large part in his conviction, no one know that for sure. However, statics show that we less Brock Turners in jail then we do Dayonn Davis’ so one can only imagine that class, privilege and race play a huge role in our justice system.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good point. Regarding activism, I find it interesting how BLM is framed vs. the current (primarily white-led) uprising against gun violence/the NRA -- and how these framings relate to the normalization of violence against Black and Brown folks.

      Delete
  3. So I'm thinking about connections to your project here, Rosa! I know the topics are very different -- but I am wondering about how Marxist social reproduction theory (e.g. that of Bourdieu) helps explain the "gentrification" of bilingual ed. How are bilingual ed programs/schools reflective of the broader class system? How are they used to secure future class status for MC and UC students? AND -- how is the "gentrification" of biled normalized? What discourses/ideologies are at work here?
    For instance, in literal gentrification of urban neighborhoods, we here discourses around urban "decay" and "renewal" to normalize the displacement of WC and poor people of color from those neighborhoods and white MC/UC seizure of those spaces.
    So there's the mechanics of gentrification (structures, techniques) and discourses (language,normalizing framings). And then -- how do WC bilingual families of color resist this gentrification?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree. I see the connections with the normalization of the disparities between the social hierarchies and for my proposed study, the normalization of gentrification. This article expanded my connections with possibly explaining what is happening in dual-language programs in terms of them being gentrified with social reproduction theory and how this shift hasn't been questioned since it's been normalized. This definitely broadens the applicability of other theories to my project.

      Delete